<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burning the installation DVD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/</link>
	<description>Discover the Desktop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:06:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dru</title>
		<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pcbsd.org/?p=64#comment-81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the clarification.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aphid69</title>
		<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>aphid69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pcbsd.org/?p=64#comment-80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Correction:&lt;/b&gt; I didn&#039;t properly edit my original post--while Brasero is very easy to use, and I&#039;ve had zero problems w/ discs burned using Brasero, I don&#039;t believe it offers quite the flexibility or completeness of ImgBurn on Windows. And ImgBurn verifies disks following burn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Correction:</b> I didn&#8217;t properly edit my original post&#8211;while Brasero is very easy to use, and I&#8217;ve had zero problems w/ discs burned using Brasero, I don&#8217;t believe it offers quite the flexibility or completeness of ImgBurn on Windows. And ImgBurn verifies disks following burn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dru</title>
		<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pcbsd.org/?p=64#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great! Screenshots are much appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Screenshots are much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aphid69</title>
		<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>aphid69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pcbsd.org/?p=64#comment-74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the &quot;Burning the Installation DVD&quot; section of the online PC-BSD Handbook, I suggest changing the example burning tool for Gnome from GnomeBaker to Brasero. Brasero is the current (and recent, afaik) shipping tool. Brasero&#039;s ease of use and quality of work equals the Windows tool, ImgBurn, IMHO, while offering greater flexibility. 

I&#039;ll send a couple of screenshots along. 

Keep up the great work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the &#8220;Burning the Installation DVD&#8221; section of the online PC-BSD Handbook, I suggest changing the example burning tool for Gnome from GnomeBaker to Brasero. Brasero is the current (and recent, afaik) shipping tool. Brasero&#8217;s ease of use and quality of work equals the Windows tool, ImgBurn, IMHO, while offering greater flexibility. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll send a couple of screenshots along. </p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Langille</title>
		<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Langille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pcbsd.org/?p=64#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[8.1 has what?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8.1 has what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Langille</title>
		<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Langille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pcbsd.org/?p=64#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, everything there looks OK. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, everything there looks OK. <img src='http://blog.pcbsd.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Langille</title>
		<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Langille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 01:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pcbsd.org/?p=64#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Testing, what&#039;s wrong with URLs?

http://langille.org/

&lt;a href=&quot;http://langille.org&quot; title=&quot;testing&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Langille.ORG&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing, what&#8217;s wrong with URLs?</p>
<p><a href="http://langille.org/" rel="nofollow">http://langille.org/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://langille.org" title="testing" rel="nofollow">Langille.ORG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dru</title>
		<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pcbsd.org/?p=64#comment-32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wordpress mangling URLs in comments is REALLY irritating. Anyone know how to fix this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress mangling URLs in comments is REALLY irritating. Anyone know how to fix this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dru</title>
		<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>dru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pcbsd.org/?p=64#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[selasky.org                                                                                                                                                
8.1 does include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/video4bsd&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;webcamd&lt;/a&gt;. We definitely need to get this documented in the wiki and get a GUI interface for it (as it is currently command line). Please let us know if your particular device is not supported--webcamd is pretty new for FreeBSD and could use more testers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>selasky.org<br />
8.1 does include <a href="http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/video4bsd" rel="nofollow">webcamd</a>. We definitely need to get this documented in the wiki and get a GUI interface for it (as it is currently command line). Please let us know if your particular device is not supported&#8211;webcamd is pretty new for FreeBSD and could use more testers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venky</title>
		<link>http://blog.pcbsd.org/2010/08/burning-the-installation-dvd/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Venky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pcbsd.org/?p=64#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When does PC-BSD plan to support UVC based webcams. I am not sure if PC-BSD can call itself a modern desktop OS without having wide support for webcams, what say?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When does PC-BSD plan to support UVC based webcams. I am not sure if PC-BSD can call itself a modern desktop OS without having wide support for webcams, what say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
